Alboran Energy Strategy Consutlatns

August 2023

  • Energy Musings, August 28, 2023

    Written by

    Allen Brooks

    on

    in

    Energy Musings contains articles and analyses dealing with important issues and developments within the energy industry, including historical perspective, with potentially significant implications for executives planning their companies’ future.

    Download the PDF

    August 28, 2023

    The Frozen Climate Views Of The IPCC

    The CLINTEL Foundation has published a book examining key sections of the IPCC’s AR6 report based on research by a team of climate scientist members. The team looked at 13 key topics supporting the IPCC’s narrative that CO2 is single-handedly destroying the planet’s climate. The CLINTEL team identified examples (there are many) where the IPCC ignored important climate data and studies because they undercut the CO2 narrative. This is an important book and should be read by everyone interested in understanding the climate change issue, the science supporting onerous climate change policies, and how nature plays a role that is being ignored by the IPCC. READ MORE

    The Frozen Climate Views Of The IPCC

    In May, the Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL) published a book analyzing portions of the latest climate assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). We recently completed reading the 181-page book, The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC, and recommend everyone should read it for a more balanced assessment of the state of the climate change issue. The book illuminates scientific evidence and studies ignored by the IPCC because they might undercut the narrative of CO2 single-handedly destroying the planet’s climate. The book is available at the usual spots – Amazon, Barnes and Noble, etc., but you also can download a copy from the foundation’s website.

    Exhibit 1. A Treasure Trove Of Climate Clarity

    Source: CLINTEL

    Netherlands-based CLINTEL was founded in 2019 and currently has 1600+ scientist members who have signed the foundation’s World Climate Declaration stating that there is no climate crisis. The foundation’s objective is to generate knowledge and understanding of the causes and effects of climate change as well as the effects of climate policy. The listed objectives of CLINTEL include:

    1. Communicating objectively and transparently what facts are available about climate change and climate policy and identifying where facts turn into assumptions and predictions.

    2. Conducting and stimulating public debate about the issues along with carrying out investigative reporting in this field.

    Read the full article on Energy-Musings.com »

  • Energy Musings, August 24, 2023

    Written by

    Allen Brooks

    on

    in

    Energy Musings contains articles and analyses dealing with important issues and developments within the energy industry, including historical perspective, with potentially significant implications for executives planning their companies’ future.

    Download the PDF

    August 24, 2023

    Is National Fisheries Pissed At BOEM?

    The latest comment letter from the National Marine Fisheries Service to BOEM about the Beacon Wind offshore projects. NWFS has concerns with the plan and was sharply critical of the way BOEM has handled the agency’s prior comments and concerns. The gauntlet was thrown down with the warning that continued ignoring of NWFS concerns would lead to a rejection of a “no jeopardy” ruling that would derail the wind farm’s development. How much is the surge in whale deaths playing in this interagency dispute? Another dead whale washed ashore on Monday – now 66 since December 1, 2022. READ MORE

    Is National Fisheries Pissed At BOEM?

    We recently read the August 14, 2023, cover letter to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) from Michael Pentony, the Regional Administrator of the Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). NWFS is part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The letter was in response to BOEM’s request for comments related to its Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the construction, operation, and decommissioning (COP) of Beacon Wind Energy LLC’s proposed wind energy facilities (Beacon Wind 1 and 2) off the coast of Massachusetts.

    Pentony wrote of his organization’s concerns with the plan and recommended approaches to help ease the regulatory process. The letter also contained criticisms of BOEM’s work, with NWFS’ sharpest rebuke in the opening paragraph of Appendix A attached to the letter. The critical comment reflects frustration with BOEM’s treatment of NWFS’ input to previous requests for comments about various offshore wind projects. Here is what NWFS wrote in that opening paragraph in a section headed “Purpose and Need.”

    “Since NMFS is an action agency and anticipating a request for incidental take authorization under the MMPA [Marine Mammal Protection Act], we need our Purpose and Need for the action to be clearly stated in the EIS. While BOEM did provide cooperating agencies an opportunity to coordinate on development of the Purpose and Need for the EIS before publication of the NOI, corrections provided by NMFS were not incorporated in the Purpose and Need statement included in the NOI. Some of the edits made by BOEM are additional deviations from previously agreed upon language. We recommend this be corrected in the DEIS [Draft Environmental Impact Statement] by incorporating previously provided revisions for Beacon Wind and following template language developed through extensive interagency cooperation in 2022, including for the NMFS-specific purpose and need.”

    Where does this frustration with BOEM come from? Most likely it began with the December 1, 2021, comment letter about the Mayflower Wind (now known as SouthCoast Wind) NOI to prepare an EIS. In those comments, NMFS discussed the speed with which BOEM was putting out requests for input and information about various offshore wind projects, which was not allowing adequate time for the agency to respond. Pentony wrote in his cover letter for NWFS’ comments on the SouthCoast Wind project:

    “The high number of projects moving through the NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act] process between now and 2024 makes it very difficult for us to provide the detailed level of review and interagency cooperation we have provided in the past. The extensive interagency cooperation we have invested with you to improve the NEPA documents for previous wind energy projects is no longer feasible, and we will be required to take a more limited Cooperating Agency role in the process.”

    So BOEM was working so fast that a key agency that advises on the maritime and fishing environmental risks of offshore wind couldn’t do its job properly. Is that like a doctor skipping an examination before telling you what you must do to cure an illness?

    Read the full article on Energy-Musings.com »

  • Energy Musings, August18, 2023

    Written by

    Allen Brooks

    on

    in

    Energy Musings contains articles and analyses dealing with important issues and developments within the energy industry, including historical perspective, with potentially significant implications for executives planning their companies’ future.

    Download the PDF

    August 18, 2023

    Offshore Wind’s Whale Problem Getting More Attention

    Thrown To The Wind, a documentary by Michael Shellenberger highlights the issue of underwater noise from offshore wind construction activity and its potential link to the surge in whale deaths. We are killing humpback whales at twice the rate for a sustainable population! READ MORE

    Canada’s Clean Energy Moves

    Two announcements in Ontario about building new nuclear power plants may eliminate the province’s long-term power projected shortfall. Our west, Eco-Refinery is planning to build a GTL plant producing clean diesel fuel that is better for the environment and diesel consumers. READ MORE

    New England Electricity Users Rest Easier – Should They?

    New electricity demand forecasts, plus more behind-the-meter solar and delayed power plant closures are giving ISO-NE officials greater comfort that winter blackout risk is reduced. READ MORE

    Offshore Wind’s Whale Problem Getting More Attention

    The rising number of dead whales washing ashore along the East Coast of America is drawing greater scrutiny. Michael Shellenberger, an author, former public relations official, and investigator of the Twitter Files, who now publishes a newsletter on Substack.com called Public News, has begun writing about the dead whale issue. More importantly, an organization he started, Environmental Progress, along with his newsletter has produced a 30-minute documentary on the issue of underwater noise from offshore wind construction activity and its possible impact on whales. The movie highlights how loud underwater noise may contribute to the recent surge in whale deaths despite the government’s denial of any linkage. It certainly demonstrates how uncomfortable the noise is for humans!

    Starting in 2017 and up to November 2022, North American right whales have been suffering from an “unusual mortality event” with nine whales dying from entanglement with fishing gear and 20 from injuries. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has noted that the recorded deaths represent only those known to the public because the carcasses washed ashore. Any whale dying offshore where the carcass sinks to the ocean floor remains unknown. We have no accurate whale death toll.

    Read the full article on Energy-Musings.com »

  • Energy Musings, August 12, 2023

    Written by

    Allen Brooks

    on

    in

    Energy Musings contains articles and analyses dealing with important issues and developments within the energy industry, including historical perspective, with potentially significant implications for executives planning their companies’ future.

    Download the PDF

    August 12, 2023

    The Unlevel Offshore Regulatory Playing Field

    Offshore wind has been adopted as the high-value way for America to cut its carbon emissions and stop climate change. The Biden-Harris administration has established a goal of installing 30 GW of offshore wind generating capacity by 2030. This goal has motivated offshore energy regulators to move aggressively to approve new wind projects. They have gone from impartial regulators to offshore wind cheerleaders. As they administer the regulatory process, they often ignore the laws and rules that should be governing the offshore wind program. Those laws and rules govern offshore oil and gas. Why are oil and gas treated differently than offshore wind?

    READ MORE

    The Unlevel Offshore Regulatory Playing Field

    “As part of the Biden-Harris administration’s goal of deploying 30 gigawatts of offshore wind energy capacity by 2030, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) today announced it will initiate the environmental review of a proposed 2,430-megawatt wind energy project offshore Massachusetts.” That was the opening line of BOEM’s June 29th press release announcing the publication of its Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Construction and Operations Plan (COP) submitted by the wind project’s developer, Beacon Wind, LLC. One more offshore wind (OSW) project is moving forward.

    The announcement signaled the opening of the review process for Beacon Wind, whose highlights were described in the press release:

    “Construction and operation of two wind energy facilities (Beacon Wind 1 and Beacon Wind 2) offshore Massachusetts with a total capacity of at least 2,430 megawatts of clean, renewable wind energy, which could power over 850,000 homes each year.

    “Installation of up to 155 turbines, up to two offshore substation platforms, and up to two offshore export cables, which are planned to make landfall in Astoria, New York, and Waterford, Connecticut.”

    Those 155 wind turbines represent roughly 5% of the total expected to be approved by BOEM in support of the Biden-Harris administration’s OSW program. The program calls for building 30 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind generating capacity by 2030. This will require 3,000 offshore wind turbines pounded into the seabed between Massachusetts and Virginia over the next seven years. Their approvals are being “streamlined” by BOEM, and that sea of turbines will be bolstered by another 5,000 turbines thereafter. Critics have described Biden’s OSW program as the “industrialization” of the Atlantic Ocean, suggesting it will dramatically change our offshore waters with the possibility of creating multiple environmental issues and potentially putting a meaningful portion of our fishing industry out of business.

    Read the full article on Energy-Musings.com »

  • Energy Musings, August 8, 2023

    Written by

    Allen Brooks

    on

    in

    Energy Musings contains articles and analyses dealing with important issues and developments within the energy industry, including historical perspective, with potentially significant implications for executives planning their companies’ future.

    Download PDF

    August 8, 2023

    Aspirational CAFE Policy To Disrupt U.S. Auto Market

    The Transportation Department plans to boost the CAFE standards to levels that will force the auto industry to only build EVs by 2032. The proposed standards will be impossible for automakers to reach without shifting their entire output to EVs, especially after the mpg of EVs are downgraded. GM’s latest financial results highlight the power and profitability of its ICE vehicle franchise. The EV transition will depend on the successful introduction of price-competitive EVs such as Chevrolet’s Equinox EV being introduced this fall. Examining the challenges impacting this transition includes reviewing the latest Anderson Economic Group’s EV versus ICE vehicle fueling cost study. READ MORE

    Aspirational CAFE Policy To Disrupt U.S. Auto Market

    Dreamers in the Transportation Department, under the spell of White House social engineers, unveiled a nearly 700-page plan to boost the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for U.S. passenger cars, as well as trucks and SUVs. By 2032, the government wants cars to average 66.4 miles per gallon, up from 44.1 mpg set last year. Trucks and SUVs will need to average 54.4 mpg, up from 32.1 mpg.

    In an additional debilitating move for the auto industry, the Energy Department is proposing to reduce the “miles per gallon equivalent” for electric vehicles (EV). For example, it would cut the rating for Ford Motor Company’s F-150 Lightning from 237 mpg-e to only 67. This means even more EVs will need to be sold if the auto companies are to avoid penalties for failing to meet the government’s CAFE standards.

    The EV became the Obama administration’s ‘golden calf’ and was foisted on the public and auto industry as the solution for global warming. Money for EVs was abundant, and with the help of the United Auto Workers union, became the carrot to drive the transportation industry transition. The stick was handed to the bureaucrats in the Energy, Environment, and Transportation Departments to create ‘aspirational’ standards to ensure EVs’ success regardless of the environmental and economic costs.

    As Obama’s policymakers began implementing their environmental and energy plans, the domestic automobile and electricity industries were targeted. Remember when Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle in an interview during his 2008 presidential campaign:

    “You know, when I was asked earlier about the issue of coal, uh, you know — Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. Even regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or bad. Because I’m capping greenhouse gases, coal power plants, you know, natural gas, you name it — whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, uh, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”

    The policymakers from Obama’s administration are now alive and well and in control of the Biden administration’s environmental policies. Their bureaucratic supporters control the key enforcement agencies and understand the goals and objectives of these policymakers. Thus, we should not be surprised by what the Editorial Board of The Wall Street Journal called “Biden’s Summer Regulatory Onslaught.”

    Read the full article on Energy-Musings.com »

  • Energy Musings, August 2, 2023

    Written by

    Allen Brooks

    on

    in

    Energy Musings contains articles and analyses dealing with important issues and developments within the energy industry, including historical perspective, with potentially significant implications for executives planning their companies’ future.

    Download the PDF

    August 2, 2023

    Climate Uncertainty And Risks Viewed By Judith Curry

    Curry’s book is a tough read because it forces you to consider how much is unknown and uncertain about climate change science. A controversial climate scientist who was harassed and pressured to resign her tenured professorship and position as chair of the engineering school at Georgia Tech, Curry began to investigate why questioning the science was so unsettling. According to Curry, there are better ways to seek climate change solutions than our current fortress mentality approach. Read the book to understand this critical policy debate that is changing our economy and lives. READ MORE

    Higher Oil Prices Drive Energy Stock Recovery

    The S&P 500 Index sector report for July showed Energy was the top performer. After six months of poor performance in 2023, the rise in oil prices and improving economic outlooks boosting demand helped performance. Crude oil prices reached the highest level since April ($80 per barrel) and the monthly increase matched that of January 2022. Headwinds have become tailwinds and investors may be forced to reconsider their aversion to owning Energy stocks. READ MORE

    Climate Uncertainty And Risks Viewed By Judith Curry

    We just finished reading Judith Curry’s book, Climate Uncertainty And Risks: Rethinking Our Response, which provides a wonderful but challenging journey through the political minefield of climate change science and its policy prescriptions. For those of us who have been researching and writing about climate change – the science, data, and policy recommendations – we noted that the book’s title is suddenly out of date. U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres has just upped the climate rhetoric. The greenhouse effect of the 1980s was overtaken by global warming, which often was described as global heating. Then terminology shifts came quicker going from climate change to the climate crisis, the climate emergency, and now global boiling. What’s next – global vaporization?

    Exhibit 1. Discovering What We Know And Do Not Know

    Source: eBay

    Curry’s new book was published in June. In January, Curry wrote on her blog about the book, its origin and objectives, the peer review process it was subjected to, and the book’s cost. The book was peer reviewed and issued by an academic publisher, Anthem, which wished to expand its ‘Environment and Sustainability Initiative’. Choosing this publisher made for a better volume in Curry’s view because of the peer review process, but it also created a cost problem for the book and its various formats. Imagine an author worried about how an expensive book might limit the reach and impact of her thinking!

    Read the full article on Energy-Musings.com »

Site by Pharéo | Hosted on The Permanently Moving Network